"AI is cheaper" stops being true once your own hours enter the equation. This compares both routes honestly — generation costs, retries, your time at whatever it's worth, and revision rounds.
| Route | Cash cost | Your hours | True total |
|---|
Hour estimates assume roughly 45 minutes of hands-on work per finished minute of AI video at "comfortable" skill — prompting, reviewing takes, re-rolling failures and assembling. Freelance route assumes ~1 hour of your time per video for briefing and revision rounds.
Disclosure: some links may be affiliate links, at no extra cost to you.
Price the pure generation side in the cost calculator, and see how many clips a given length actually requires in the specs calculator — the clip count is what drives the hours.
For short clips, clearly yes. For longer videos it depends on what your time is worth: AI shifts cost from cash to hours. Once your rate passes roughly $75/hour, a freelancer often costs less in true terms.
Around 45 minutes of hands-on work per finished minute once you're comfortable — writing prompts, reviewing takes, re-rolling failures and assembling. Beginners should expect two to three times that.
When there's a client deadline, when the video needs real people or brand-specific footage, or when your hourly rate is high enough that the time cost exceeds the quote. Hiring also transfers the risk of not getting a usable result.